|Add Memory | Add To Friends|
|Upchuck (profile) wrote, |
on 11-6-2006 at 5:39pm
|Is a rose, if by any other name, still not lovely?
Is a crutch, if by any other name, still not aiding and abetting in the coping with or enjoyment of life?
It's spilled from one journal to the next, it might as well be my turn to host the discussion for awhile.
I think I know what Rube's is getting at. I say crutch, you think bad. I say tool the facilitates walking (as in the literal definition of crutch), you say good. In this way, I say crutch+drugs as a way to cope with life, you say no. I say tool+plant, you say a way to feel happy or get enjoyment out of life.
That brings it back to the whole debate. If you are using a drug to get enjoyment, or to "feel good" then are you not using the drug in such a way that it could be considered a crutch (def. a tool which is used to do something that was previously unable to be accomplished considering the circumstances). Why would you need a drug to make you "feel good" if you could not otherwise "feel good" without the drug?